This week we have learned what section drawing is. It is kind of drawing that shows a structure’s interior parts when it is cut by a straight plane. Our instructors gave us a model owned by an old freshman year student to draw sections of it. This time we only cut the structure by a vertical plane and drew it isometric.
As you could see in my previous post more detailed, we were assigned to produce a diagram from a part of the movie that we have choosen. (New Semester | Diagram | Spatial Experiences). In the second stage of the assignment, as groups, we were assigned to produce a collage work from the diagrams that we have produced. Again this collage diagram should needed to hold the idea of our keyword’s.
Finally new semester is started after this long period of holiday. And also new semester has came with new studio! 🙂 Yes, we moved out to our brand new campus and of course to a brand new studio. The new studio serves utterly different experiences to us. I hope it will bring luck and success 🙂
We have started the new semester rapidly. Our new topic is “analysis o spatial experiences”. As groups of 4 members, we were given a list of movies to watch one of them and select a scene from that movie to analyse the spatial experiences. We have chosen Inception. After I watched the movie I have selected a scene which includes several different spaces which are connected with an imaginary elevator. After I analysed the scene I have decided on my keywords: Layers / Levels / Different Experiences / Broken Continuity.
So I have produced a diagram:
After the critique hours I have improved my diagram:
Here is my final drawing assignment of Architectural Communication Techniques course above. It is an isometric drawing of METU preparatory school additional building. Before I start to drawing, I visited the campus of METU to better understand the building and analyse it with comparing with the other buildings that have been located in the campus.
Here are some photos of the Language School Preparatory building below.
Final we could reach the end of our first semester. This semester assignments were all corelated with eachother. All of the assignments were the one step further of the previous ones. So that, we were responsible for our every step in the final jury. And in the last step of the assignement, we were allowed to use every operatios such as tear & fold, scale & stretch. Our instructors were expecting us to discover and use the potential of these operations. In result, I have used those operations to promote my strategy. My strategy was “integration of dense and less dense group”.
Here are some snapshots from my final jury 🙂
After I read the Adolf Loos’ book’s chapter of “Ornament & Crime”, I found his language very strong and straightforward. He is writing his opinions just the way they are. His language is unadorned as his non-ornamented architectural works. I think it is the thing which has impressed me most about the book. Because I think I am more into the books which are more unembellished. At that moment, I decided to go over further on the book.
I read the chapter which has named “Arcitecture(1910)”. Initially, he starts his writing with thouching upon the responsibilities of architects to the environment. He points out that the products of architects should be in a rapport with the environment that that product has. He says that “Whether an architect is good or bad in his/her job, he/she should respect the holiness of a lake”. With this way, he expresses his ideas about how an architect should be. Another thing which is worth mentioning is that, he is seriously against ornament as I read at “Ornament & Crime”. The thing which has made me a little bit suprised is that he is advocating his ideas about ornament most parts of the book. In this chapter of book, he claims that ornament makes our culture destroy. Some people may claim that ornament is the thing that makes our culture pernament. They have points to think like that. Because the only objects that have survived from the past to present are the ones with lot of ornament. Whereas, there is a point that is unnoticed. They have ramained because they were out of functionality, because they were so fancy. So that, they were not wear off to melt away. That’s why they have survived to present. Loos evaluate this by saying “missunderstanding the past and the culture”.
Another noteworthy thing is that he alleges that graphical arts and architecture are contrast and very different from eachother. In other words, in those days the most well-paid architects were the ones whose projects were nice looking on the paper, not the ones who were good at building. Nevertheless, Loos points out that a good architect might be bad at thecnical sketching and in contrast, a bad architect can be a good sketcher. I think that was the thing which is surprising that I have just learned and stayed in my mind. He supports that a product cannot be succesful at branch at the same time. For instance, a novel cannot be a succesfull one in terms of both theatre and novel categories. It is same with the condition of graphical arts and architectural works.
These were the things that has made me think and realize some points that I was ot aware of. Shall I recommend this book to new architects? Yes, I would. Because of his simple and straightforward language and also the world view of Adolf Loos. I think he made me gained a different look to the architecture. Next plan: Read the whole book!